B. DAYAL
Ram Nath – Appellant
Versus
Sarjoo – Respondent
JUDGMENT
B. Dayal, J. - This is an Ex. Second Appeal by the decree-holder. He obtained a decree from the court of Small Causes at Bombay and got it transferred for execution to the court of the Munsif at Jaunpur. In execution of that decree, he got immoveable property attached. The judgment-debtor objected to the execution on the ground that in view of the amendment for Sec. 42, C. P. C. by the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1954, the transferee court could not execute the decree against immoveable property. Both the courts below upheld the objection and disallowed execution against immoveable property.
2. In this Second Appeal it is contended that a decree passed by a Presidency Small Cause Court is not subject to the restriction made by the new amendment in Sec. 42, C. P C. in this State. It is contended that under Sec. 31 of the Presidency Small Cause Court Act, the President, Small Cause Court could transfer a decree for execution against immoveable property to a regular court or to the High Court and upon such transfer the decree could be executed by sale for immoveable property. Consequently, this right has not been taken away by the amendment of Sec. 42, C. P. C. I am unable
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.