SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 412

K. B. ASTHANA
Binda Din – Appellant
Versus
Shrimati Pran Dei – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.M. Dayal, Advocate, for the Defendant-Appellant; V.K. Burman, Advocate, for the Plaintiff-Respondent

JUDGMENT

K.B. Asthana, J. - The only question that arises for determination in this Second Appeal is whether a notice terminating the tenancy of the defendant appellant and asking him to quit on the expiry of thirty days from the receipt thereof was a valid notice.

2. The undisputed facts of the case are that the plaintiff respondent is the owner of a building in which the defendant appellant took on rent rooms in the ground floor including some machinery fitted therein for grinding wheat flour and Dals. A rent at the rate of Rs. 150/- per month was paid. The plaintiff served upon the defendant the notice in dispute terminating the tenancy and asking him to quit on the expiry of thirty days from the receipt thereof. Since the defendant did not comply with the terms of that notice hence the suit for ejectment, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits, which has given rise to this appeal. It was averred in the plaint that a deed of lease was executed stating the terms of the tenancy which was a monthly tenancy and was terminable by a month's notice. The plaintiff did file the said document as evidence in the suit but it was impounded as it did not bear the requisite stamp duty an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top