SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 387

M. H. BEG, R. S. PATHAK
Laxmi Dal Mills – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Hari Swarup, Advocate, for the Petitioner; S.C, for the Opposite Parties

JUDGMENT

M.H. Beg, J. - These are seven connected writ petitions in each of which the petitioner is a partnership firm which is registered and licensed as a dealer under Section 3-E of the U.P. Sales' Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') . Each petitioner is a dealer in food grains purchasing large quantities of pulses from Dal manufacturers every year. The manufacturers are alleged to have purchased these as 'unbroken seeds' and converted them into Dal, by putting them through a process which is described as 'manufacture', before selling it to petitioners. According to the petitioners, the process through which the unbroken seeds were put by the manufacturers did not involve a change in the chemical composition or the commercial character of the produce but put the pulses into a state fit for consumption by braking up the seeds and cleaning the raw product. The petitioners allege that they are, therefore, not first purchasers of Dal liable to pay purchase tax. Each petitioner has also questioned the constitutional validity of Section 3-D of the U.P. Sales Tax Act as well as of the exercise of the powers vested in the State Government in issuing the notifications against f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top