SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 365

GYANENDRA KUMAR, R. S. PATHAK, S. N. DWIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA, W. BROOME
Jai Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
J.N. Chaturvedi, Advocate, for the Applicant

JUDGMENT

S.N. Dwivedi, J. - Twelve cases have been referred to us for opinion on certain. matters. They may be divided into two groups. The first group consists of 3 second appeals Nos. 1442 of 1966, 1948 of 1966 and 2151 of 1966; the second group comprises 9 criminal revisions Nos. 1252 of 1966, 1363 of 1966, 1364 of 1966, 1365 of 1966, 1385 of 1966, 1386 of 1966, 1387 of 1966, 1388 of 1966 and 1397 of 1966.

2. Second appeal No. 2151 of 1966 is filed against the judgment and decree of Sri Indra Singh, a District Judge. Sri Indra Singh was directly appointed to the U.P. Higher Judicial Service. He was taken from the Bar. The other two appeals seek to challenge the decree and judgment of two Civil Judges passed in two first appeals. These three appeals have been referred to a larger Bench by Mr. Justice Mathur. In second appeal No. 2151 of 1966 he has referred two questions. They are : -

1. Was Sri Indra Singh validly appointed as a District Judge ? Did he have the jurisdiction to hear the appeal ?

2. Can the competency and jurisdiction of Sri Indra Singh be challenged in collateral proceedings like appeals and revisions ?

3. In the other two appeals Mr. Justice Mathur has formulated t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top