SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 251

RAJESHWARI PRASAD, S. K. VERMA
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Raja Mahipal Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Junior Standing Counsel, for the Appellants; Bishun Singh and Lalji Sinha, Advocates, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Rajeshwari Prasad, J. - This is a plaintiffs first appeal arising out of Suit No. 12 of 1951 of the court of Civil Judge, Hamirpur.

2. Sri Guman Behari, an idol installed in the Rainpur temple at Charkhari is the first plaintiff which sued through the Collector, Hamirpur, as the Manager of the temple. State of Uttar Pradesh is the second plaintiff.

3. Plaintiffs filed this suit against Raja Mahipal Singh, defendant-respondent described as ruler of Sarila, Pargana Rath, district Hamirpur, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 35,310/-.

4. The facts of the case as disclosed by the plaintiffs are, that the first plaintiff is a deity installed in the temple known as Rainpur temple, and it was managed by trustees appointed by the ruler of the former Charkhari State. Charkhari State subsequently ceased to exist, by virtue of the provisions of the Provinces and Estates (Absorption of Enclaves) Order, 1950, and its territories were absolved in the State of Uttar Pradesh, which now is part of Hamirpur district. The Collector, Hamirpur was the person who managed the temple thereafter. It was alleged that the defendant borrowed, in his personal capacity and for his private purposes connect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top