M. H. BEG, S. C. MANCHANDA
Sales Tax Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Ladha Singh Mal Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This is a case stated under Sec. 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as he Act. The question referred is :
"Whether powerloom would fall under the term cloth manufactured by mills mentioned at Sl. 2, of List I of Part I of the Schedule issued under Not. No. ST-117/X-923-1948, dated June 8, 1948."
2. The relevant year of assessment is 1950-51. The dealer manufactures cloth on power looms and also imports cloth. The dealer claimed that the cloth manufactured on power looms did not fall within Serial No. 2 of the notification No. ST-117'X-923-1948, dated June 8, 1948, issued under the powers conferred under Sec. 3-A of the Act. The relevant portion of this notification reads: -
"........ proceeds of sale of goods entered in column 2 of the schedule hereto shall not be included in the turnover of any dealer except at the point in the series of sales by successive dealers mentioned in column 4 thereof under the circumstances shown in column 2 thereof..........."
Sl. No. | Name of goods | Circumstances under which to be included in turnover. | Point of tax. | Rate of tax per rupee. |
2. | Cloth manufactured by mills. | If imported from outside U.P. | Sale by importer Sale by m |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.