SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 274

M. H. BEG, S. C. MANCHANDA
Sales Tax Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
Ladha Singh Mal Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.C, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This is a case stated under Sec. 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as he Act. The question referred is :

"Whether powerloom would fall under the term cloth manufactured by mills mentioned at Sl. 2, of List I of Part I of the Schedule issued under Not. No. ST-117/X-923-1948, dated June 8, 1948."

2. The relevant year of assessment is 1950-51. The dealer manufactures cloth on power looms and also imports cloth. The dealer claimed that the cloth manufactured on power looms did not fall within Serial No. 2 of the notification No. ST-117'X-923-1948, dated June 8, 1948, issued under the powers conferred under Sec. 3-A of the Act. The relevant portion of this notification reads: -

"........ proceeds of sale of goods entered in column 2 of the schedule hereto shall not be included in the turnover of any dealer except at the point in the series of sales by successive dealers mentioned in column 4 thereof under the circumstances shown in column 2 thereof..........."

Sl. No.

Name of goods

Circumstances under which to be included in turnover.

Point of tax.

Rate of tax per rupee.

2.

Cloth manufactured by mills.

If imported from outside U.P.

Sale by importer Sale by m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top