JUDGMENT

V. Bhargava, J. - We have heard learned. counsel for the petitioner and find no force in this petition. The main point urged by the learned counsel was that in the order passed by the State Government under Section 7-F of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, the reasons have not been given by the Government for coming to the view that the precondition to interference by the Government did exist. In other words, what is urged is that this order should have been a speaking order and should have on its lace indicated the grounds on which the Government held that the precondition for making the order as laid down by Section 7-F existed. This point has no force at all because Section 7-F does not require any finding as to the existence of the precondition before the State Government can exercise its power under Section 7-F. The provision is that the Government can make such orders as appears to it necessary for the ends of justice. In the circumstances, what the Government has to find out is whether it appears to it that some order is required for the ends of justice. The use of the word "appears" makes it clear that though the Government has to act in a quasi