SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1302

J.J.MUNIR
Rohit (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Amit Kumar Chauhan, Rajesh Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. Rohit Kumar, a child in conflict with law has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') assailing a judgment and order passed by Sri Sarvesh Chandra Pandey, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court no.1, Azamgarh dated 21.12.2017 dismissing Criminal Appeal No.151 of 2017 and affirming an order dated 14.12.2017 made by the Juvenile Justice Board, Azamgarh in Case no.144 of 2017 (arising out of Case Crime no.170 of 2017), under Sections 354A, 376D, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act, Police Station Sarai Meer, District Azamgarh denying bail plea by Rohit.

2. Facts giving rise to the instant revision are that a First Information Report was lodged by one Urmila wife of Ram Ajor to the effect that her daughter and hereinafter referred to as the 'prosecutrix' aged about 15 - 16 years was eve teased by some boys who are natives of her village, to wit, Surendra son of Ram Jatan, Amarjeet son of Lal Singh, Suraj son of Mohan and Rohit son of Harish Chandra (revisionist), and, that she complained in the matter to their parents, which did not move th







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top