SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 4168

MANOJ MISRA
ALOK KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Devesh Kumar Shukla, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Misra, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant application has been filed seeking quashing of the proceedings of Criminal Case No.382 of 2012 (State v. Alok Kumar Gupta), under sections 420, 406 I.P.C. pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-VIII, Aligarh.

3. A perusal of the record would go to show that according to the prosecution case, a cheque of Rs. 50,000/- was issued by the applicant for the purchase of certain jewelry items on 7.1.2014, which was submitted for encashment but the bank concerned returned the cheque for want of sufficient funds in his account. It is alleged that later, the applicant manipulated with the Bank and, on a back date, got a letter received from the applicant to stop payment on the aforesaid cheque.

4. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that in respect of dishonor of cheque, proceeding under section 138 N.I. Act have already been initiated, therefore, prosecution under section 420 I.P.C. is not legally justified. The other submission is that from the statement of the bank manager, which has been recorded during the course of investigation, it has come that t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top