SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1363

IRSHAD ALI
NOOPUR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
O.P. Tiwari for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Rajiv Singh Chauhan for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Irshad Ali, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned Chief Standing Counsel has accepted notice on behalf the respondent No. 1.

3. Sri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

4. Learned Standing counsel has produced the instruction received from the respondent, wherein the ground taken in the impugned order rejecting the claim of the petitioner for the grant of appointment on compassionate ground has been supported. There is nothing otherwise except the ground taken in passing of the impugned order.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother of the petitioner Late Laxmi Srivastava was posted as Headmaster in a Primary School run and managed by the Board of Basic Education, who died while in service on 13.5.2017. The petitioner is a divorced lady, who was divorced vide judgment and decree dated 8.3.2013 and since then she was residing alongwith her mother and was totally dependent upon her income.

6. As per the Government order and circular issued by the respondent-department, the petitioner applied for consideration of grant of appointment on compassionate ground. Due to non


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top