SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1378

ASHOK KUMAR
SRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RASHIDA BANNO – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Adarsh Bhushan for the Appellant; Ram Singh and Amit Kumar Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ashok Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Adarsh Bhushan, learned counsel for the appellant-insurance company and Sri Ram Singh, learned counsel for the claimants-respondents.

2. This appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 8.5.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, District Bareilly in M.A.C.P. No. 511 of 2015.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the impugned judgment is not acceptable as the Tribunal has not considered the plea of the insurance company with regard to the delay in lodging the First Information Report which was lodged after 55 days from the date of incidence.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the claimants/respondents has pointed out that after the accident, which took place on 24.10.2014, the victim-deceased was hospitalised in District Hospital, Uddham Singh Nagar, thereafter he was shifted at Kailash Hospital, Rudrapur and then Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, where he was treated till 13.12.2014 and since the doctors noticed that there was no recovery then a discharge slip was issued and it was advised to the claimants to take the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top