2018 Supreme(All) 1410
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
BEFORE : SUDHIR AGARWAL AND MRS. VIJAY LAKSHMI, JJ.
MUKARRAM AND ANOTHER ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 1991, decided on 31st July, 2018)
Counsel :
H.N. Sharma, H.K. Sharma, Pradeep Kumar Mishra (Amicus Curiae) for the Appellants; A.G.A. and Syed Ali Murtaza for the Respondent.
Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302/34 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Murder – Conviction – Deceased sustained a gunshot injury – Conviction recorded against accused-appellants – Deceased brother-in-law of informant PW 1 – As per opinion of doctor death occurred due to shock and haemorrhage on account of injury No. 1 – Variation in manner of occurrence stated in FIR, which got improved subsequently by witnesses of facts – PW-1 improved FIR version by attempting to explain incised wounds stating that deceased fell in a pit in which there were broken glass pieces and stones – Witnesses are close relatives and cannot be said to be independent witnesses – Third accused also had been acquitted – Strong enmity between deceased and appellant No. 2 – Incised wounds left unexplained by prosecution – Solitary gunshot injury shown that gunshot injury was sustained by deceased when his back was towards assailants – But evidence of ocular testimony is that assailants fired from front – Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt – Appellants acquitted. [Paras 14 to 51]
Result; Appeal Allowed.
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—This Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by two appellants, namely, Mukarram and Nirpal, against judgment and order dated 31.01.1991 passed by Sri Yad Ram, Special Additional Sessions Judge, Saharanpur in Session Trial No. 184 of 1989, convicting accused-appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and sentencing them to undergo for life imprisonment.
2. Factual matrix of case emanating from First Information Report (Exhibit-Ka 1) (hereinafter referred to as “FIR”) and evidence adduced before Trial Court is that on 19.01.1988 informant PW-1, Mange Ram was going to Barauli alongwith PW-2, Janeshwar of village Bahadurpur and his brother-in-law (Bahnoi), Amar Singh, resident of Village Saurana, Ram Nath and Shri Pal, both residents of Village Saurana in connection with consultation for marriage of informant’s sister. They reached at about 3.00 pm on Barauli crossing and after taking tea, proceeded towards Village Kalasiya. Hardly they covered some distance, when Appellant-2, Nirpal resident of Village Saurana alongwith his accomplice, Appellant-1, Mukarram, resident of Village Shekhpura Kadim and one unknown person came on Motorcycle from the side of Kalasiya. They stopped the Motorcycle near informant. All the three accused took out countrymade pistol and caught hold Amar Singh, saying that he poses himself to be smart litigant (Mukadmebaaz) and today they would settle the score. Saying this, all the three accused opened fire at Amar Singh as a result whereof, he fell down facing his mouth towards ground and died instantly at the spot. Informant and other persons accompanying him tried to catch them but they threatened waiving countrymade pistols and fled away towards Kalasiya on Motorcycle. There had been a long-standing litigation and enmity between Nirpal and Amar Singh (brother-in-law of informant), wherein Nirpal had also been convicted. FIR further says that on account of this enmity, Nirpal and Mukarram alongwith his accomplice have committed murder of Amar Singh (brother-in-law of informant).
3. On submission of FIR at Police Station Behat, District Saharanpur case was registered as Case Crime No. 15 of 1988 under Section 302 IPC on 19.01.1988 at 4.30 pm. Distance of Police Station from place of occurrence was about 10 kilometers. After registration of FIR usual investigation followed. Investigating Officer (hereinafter referred to as “I.O.”) visited spot, collected blood stained and simple earth in separate boxes and sealed them (marked as Exhibit-Ka 8 and Ka 9 respectively). He also prepared Exhibit Ka-3 inquest report (Panchayatnama), Exhibit-Ka 4, photo lash and other formal documents (Exhibits Ka 5 to Ka 7). Dead body of deceased was properly sealed and sent to District Hospital, Saharanpur through Constables, Pratap Singh and Anuj Tyagi for post-mortem.
4. Autopsy on the deadbody of deceased Amar Singh was conducted on 20.01.1988 at 4.00 pm by Dr. R.D. Sharma, who prepared post-mortem report, Exhibit Ka 17. According to Doctor, deceased was aged about 40 years with average built body. Rigor mortis was found present and about one day had passed since his death. Doctor found following ante-mortem injuries on the person of deceased:
“1. Wound of entry 0.75 cm X 0.75 cm X body cavity on the back and upper part of right side chest, 2 cm away from vertebral column and 7 cm away from angle of right scapula, margins inverted directed upward piercing right upper lobe of right lung and then forwards to the middle lobe of left lung and then piercing the lungs then fracturing fifth rib left side in middle and then return upwards to the neck right side. Lower part and then coming out from right supraclaviculor fossa in middle. No blackening, tattooing present.
2. Wound of exit 3.5 cm X 2 cm X body cavity on the middle of right supraclavicular fossa 2 cm above from the middle of right clavical, margins ev