SUDHIR AGARWAL, IFAQAT ALI KHAN
ARCHANA SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Kamlesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State of U.P. and its authorities and Sri S. P. Rai, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 has been filed by five petitioners, who were engaged as Lecturer for a tenure appointment of three years on 15.9.2009, 15.9.2009, 4.4.2009, 1.10.2009, respectively, and 1.10.2009 and thereafter have been allowed extension of five years by respondent 4, which has not been accepted by Vice Chancellor, Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur (hereinafter referred to as “V.C., University”). This order has been challenged by seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the same. A writ of mandamus has also been prayed directing respondents not to interfere in the functioning of petitioners as Lecturers in Department of Education of Mariahu Snatkottar Mahavidyalay, Marihau, District-Jaunpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘College’)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.