SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1651

SIDDHARTH
Jagdeo – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.B. Sahai, Adv., Sushil Kumar Dwivedi, Adv.

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Siddharth, J.

This Criminal Revision has been preferred by four accused persons against the judgment and order dated 14.9.1999 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1996 affirming the judgment and order dated 02.3.1996 passed by IInd Additional C.J.M., Fatehpur in Case No. 479 of 1992 convicting the revisionists under Section 323, I.P.C. and sentencing them six months rigorous imprisonment and convicting them under Section 325/34, I.P.C. and sentencing them to three years of Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- each and default payment of fine to undergo three months of rigorous imprisonment, directing sentence to run concurrently.

2. Heard Sri. Sushil Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri. S.H. Sachan, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State.

3. As per the report dated 23.5.2017 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, the revisionist Nos. 1, 2 and 4, namely, Jagdeo s/o of Bhola Yadav, Anant Sahai s/o Bhola Yadav and Hira Lal Yadav s/o Mahadeo have already died and death verification report dated 15.4.2017 has been sent to this Court and it is taken on record. This criminal revision



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top