DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA, VIRENDRA KUMAR
Rakesh Awasthi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Suraj Narain Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shatroghan Chaudhary, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Mr. S.C. Yadava, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.5 and Mr. Ashok Shukla, learned Counsel for the Commission.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the judgment and order dated 7.8.2015 passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as ''the Tribunal') in Claim Petition No. 1986 of 2012 (Rakesh Awasthi Vs. State of U.P. and others) whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the Claim Petition preferred by the petitioner for re-determining the seniority. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 12.12.2012 passed by the Principal Secretary, Industrial Department, Lucknow (opposite party No.1), whereby the petitioner's representation with regard to determination of seniority has been rejected.
3. According to the petitioner, after due selection and recommendation of the Public Service Commission, he was appointed on a substantive post of Printing Overseer through direct recruitment on 21.9.1993 under the Director, Prin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.