SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2755

B.AMIT STHALEKAR
Saroj – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Rajiv Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents:C.S.C. and Rajesh Yadav, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

B. AMIT STHALEKAR, J.

1. Heard Shri Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajesh Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 and 5 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3.

2. The petitioners who are seven in number are seeking quashing of the orders dated 6.1.2017 and 13.11.2017 arising out of proceedings under section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1950).

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case, as stated in the writ petition are that the petitioners were allotted plots no. 111 and 239 of Village Kishankheri, P.O. Rampur Maniharan Saharanpur areas 3 Bighas (Kachcha), 6 Bigha, 6 Bigha, 3 Bigha, 3 Bigha, 3 Bigha, 3 Bigha and 3 Bigha in village Kishankheri and Navrangpur respectively since 1987 under a scheme of Sterilization. They are stated to be poor persons of the village and are landless as stated in paragraph 3 of the writ petition. It is also stated that they have been in possession over the land in question for the last 30 years. From the reading of the impugned order it is noticed that proceedings under section 176 of the Act, 1950 were initiated against







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top