SUNITA AGARWAL
Baidurrahman @ Obedurrahman – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent
Sunita Agarwal, J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The order impugned in the present writ petition are the orders dated 18.2.2009, 20.8.2009 and 27.11.2017 passed by the Consolidation Officer, the Settlement Officer Consolidation and the Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Siddharth Nagar; respectively.
3. The petitioners are chak holder no. 424. It appears that an objection was raised by the petitioners before the Consolidation Officer that the valuation of ten rupees from their first chak in plot nos. 938 and 941 be expunged and the said valuation be added in another chak comprising of Gata Nos. 705, 706 and 708 and the rest of the valuation be adjusted in a new chak in Gata No. 951. The said request of the petitioners was not acceded to on the ground that other chak holders would be disturbed. It appears that an Appeal No. 314 was filed by the petitioners against the order dated 18.2.2009 passed by the Consolidation Officer finalising the provisional consolidation scheme on the ground that his chak prepared by the Assistant Consolidation Officer was disturbed by the Consolidatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.