RAJIV JOSHI
Rahmana Begam – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K.A. Rizvi for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 17.4.2018 passed by the Board of Revenue whereby the revision filed by the respondent no.6 was allowed.
3. The facts apparent from the record are that power of attorney was executed by the petitioner in favour of respondent no. 5 Kamaruddin on 26.2.1999 subsequently the said power of attorney was canceled. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after the cancellation of power of attorney two sale deeds were executed by Kamaruddin in favour of his wife respondent no. 6 and his sister-in-law respondent no. 7 on 14.8.2006 and 10.8.2006 respectively.
4. On the strength of sale deed the Tehsildar allowed the mutation application filed by the respondent no. 6. Against that order a revision was filed which was allowed by the Additional Collector vide order dated 22.11.2007. Against the said order petitioner filed a revision before the Commissioner Meerut Division, Meerut which was allowed vide order dated 18.7.2008. Thereafter the respondent no. 6 filed a revision under Section 219 of Land Revenue A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.