Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.

1. Heard Sri R.C. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. L.P. Mishra and Sri Manish Kumar, learned counsels representing opposite party No.1, whereas learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 has sent out of station slip.

2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, we do not deem it necessary to issue notice to the opposite party No.3.

3. We have proceeded to hear the matter in the absence of opposite party No.2 as his interest is well protected in the directions issued by us.

4. By means of present writ petition i.e Public Interest Litigation (here-in-after referred to as the 'P.I.L.'), the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

(a) Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the nomination of opposite party No.3 as one of the members of Search Committee made by the opposite party No.2 for appointment on the post of Vice-Chancellor of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, opposite party No.1 after summoning the original record regard the same.

(b) Issue a writ, director or order in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 not to give effect to the recommendations made b