SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1989

MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Yudhishthir Singh – Appellant
Versus
District Judge – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Archit Mandhyan
For the Respondent: Rajesh Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Shri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Archit Mandhyan for the defendants-petitioners and Shri Rajesh Gupta, learned counsel for the plaintiffs-respondents.

2. In these matters, the petitioners are assailing the orders dated 30.1.2018 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.2, Meerut, whereby he had decided the issue no.9 in favour of plaintiffs-respondents and rejected the applications (97-C) moved by the defendant-petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint of the Original Suit Nos.47 of 2007, 50 of 2007, 52 of 2007 & 53 of 2007 for non-disclosing any cause of action as well as the impugned order dated 4.5.2018 passed by the District Judge, Meerut, by which he has dismissed the Civil Revision Nos.42 of 2018, 41 of 2018, 43 of 2018 and 44 of 2018.

3. For the sake of convenience, the facts of leading Matter under Article 227 No.3978 of 2018 are being noted below:-

4. Brief background of the case, as is reflected from the record in question, is that Ravi Shanker Sharma filed four Original Suit Nos.47, 50, 52 and 53 all of the year 2007 for recovery of arrears of rent, mesne pr






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top