SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Shashi Kant Gupta, Ajit Kumar, JJ.
Gaon Sabha/Land Management Committee Gram Panchayat And Another - Petitioners
Vs.
State of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ - C No. 19147 of 2018
Decided On : 13-08-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashish Kumar Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Dhiraj Srivastava, Mukesh Kumar, Pushpendra Singh Jadon

Headnote:

U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 – Section 15 (h), Section 15 (h), 110, 112 – Grant of license to bhumidhar to hold his private cattle market by itself amount to an act opposed to public policy – grant of license/ renewal of earlier license in year 2018-2019 – Challenged – Held, When respondents enjoyed earlier license for holding same cattle market from 2013 onwards under order passed by appellate authority – we do not find any justification or merit in present writ petition which is confined to license of particular year 2018-2019 granted as sequel to continued grant of license since 2013. Thus, we have no hesitation in holding that the present writ petition is not maintainable as no effective relief can granted to petitioners unless and until their rights are determined in writ petition cognizable by the Single Judge – Petition dismissed. (Paras, 16 & 17)

Facts of the case:

Grant of license to bhumidhar to hold his private cattle market by itself amount to an act opposed to public policy – grant of license/ renewal of earlier license in year 2018-2019 – Challenged.

Findings of the court:

When respondents enjoyed earlier license for holding same cattle market from 2013 onwards under order passed by appellate authority – we do not find any justification or merit in present writ petition which is confined to license of particular year 2018-2019 granted as sequel to continued grant of license since 2013. Thus, we have no hesitation in holding that the present writ petition is not maintainable as no effective relief can granted to petitioners unless and until their rights are determined in writ petition cognizable by the Single Judge.

Result: Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner No.1, who is Gaon Sabha/ Land Management Committee duly constituted under the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 and the petitioner No.2 duly elected Pradhan thereof have questioned the license/ renewal of license granted at the instance of Zila Panchayat, Firozabad dated 9th May, 2018 permitting respondent no.6 and 7 to hold a cattle market in Srinagar Pachokhara for the year 2018-2019, within its territorial limits.

2. The factual matrix as we draw in a narrow compass is that for the first time, father of the petitioners late Laxmi Narain Upadhyay was granted license in the year 1957 for holding cattle market on every Friday in village Pachokhara, District-Firozabad. He continued to enjoy license to hold cattle market on year to year basis by the District Administration and later on by the Zila Panchayat. Sometimes in the year 1977 Gaon Sabha by some resolution tried to restrain late Laxmi Narain Upadhyay from holding cattle market and also filed civil suit bearing O.S. No. 239 of 1977 which came to be dismissed. However, the appeal filed by the Gaon Sabha was allowed but the judgment of the first Appellate Court was reversed in second appeal by the High Court holding that the Gaon Sabha had no power to prohibit or restrict holding of the cattle market vide judgment in Laxmi Narain Upadhya and others v. Gram Sabha, 1998 (3) AWC 1629. Vide Para 16 and 17 the court held thus:

“16. In conclusion, it is found that the resolution dated 14.8.1977 adopted by the Gaon Sabha purporting to be under Section 15 (h) of the Act is invalid, Ineffective and Inoperative in the absence of rules framed by the State Government in exercise of power conferred under Section 110 or the bye-laws as contemplated under Section 112 of the Act. The Gram Sabha has no authority, power or competence to restrict the right of the defendant-appellants in holding the cattle market on their own land. The restriction put by the Gram Sabha on the right of the defendant-appellants by resolution dated 14.8.1977 is wholly illegal arid of no consequence.

17. In the result, this appeal succeeds. It is allowed and the Judgment and decree dated 23.1.1991 passed by Special Judge (E. C. Act)/Additional District Judge, Agra in Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1986 are set aside. The resultant effect would be that the Suit No. 239 of 1977 filed by the Gaon Sabha-Pachokhra plaintiff-respondent shall stand dismissed with costs throughout.”

3. Thereafter the Gaon Sabha applied for license to hold the cattle market. The said application was rejected by the Licensing authority on 20th June, 1998. In the Meanwhile, Gaon Sabha preferred Special Leave Petition against the judgment of this Court passed in second appeal No. 234 of 1991 dated 11th March, 1998 but Special Leave Petition filed by the Gaon Sabha bearing No. 374 of 1999 however, was withdrawn by it. Late Laxmi Narain Upadhyay, died on 01.04.2010 and the license was renewed in favour of the petitioners who succeeded bhumidhari land of their father late Laxmi Narain Upadhyay.

4. Zila Panchayat, passed resolution dated 05.03.2011 that cattle market shall be held jointly only by Gaon Sabha and Zila Panchayat and consequently partnership agreement took place on 19.04.2011 between the Gaon Sabha and the Zila Panchayat whereunder it was agreed that the cattle market shall be jointly held by Zila Panchayat and Gram Sabha over the gram sabha land. This agreement was entered between the parties on the basis of resolution dated 05.03.2011 passed by the Zila Panchayat, which was later on annulled/ cancelled by the Zila Panchayat itself vide resolution dated 28th December, 2013. However, in the meanwhile, in view of the agreement between the Zila Panchayat and Gaon Sabha, the contesting respondents were not granted license/ renewal of the license from 22.04.2011 to 02.09.2011. Under the circumstances, the contesting respondents filed Writ Petition No. 24599 of 2011 before this Court questioning the agreement between the Zila Pa

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top