SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 2126

RAKESH SRIVASTAVA
AMAR CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pankaj Gupta and Ram Pratap Yadav for the Petitioner; C.S.C. and Bagesh Shukla for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Srivastava, J.—Heard Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Shri Asit Chaturvedi, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Bagesh Shukla, learned counsel for respondent No. 3.

2. The petitioner is an elected Pradhan of Gram Laksmanpur, Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh. Respondent No. 3 herein challenged the election of the petitioner under Section 12-C of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’) by means of Election Petition No. 2920 of 2015 (Ramesh Kanaujia v. Amar Chandra and others). The prayer made in the said election petition is extracted below:

^^vr% Jheku th ls fuosnu gS fd xzke iapk;r o foŒ[kŒ y{e.kiqj ij lnj rglhy ykyxat tuin izrkix<+ esa 13-12-2015 dks ?kksf"kr ifj.kke dks jksdrs iqu% erx.kuk djk;s tkus ds lEcU/k esa vkns'k ikfjr djus dh d`ik djsaA**

3. On 10.12.2018, the election petition has been finally disposed of. The operative portion of the order dated 10.12.2018 passed by the Prescribed Authority is extracted below:

^^--------mHk;i{kksa ds fo}ku vfèkoDrkx.kksa dh cgl dks lqukA okn esa fu/kkZfjr 4 fcUnqvksa ds fuLrkj.k bl izdkj gaSA

1- D;k erx.kuk esa /k



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top