SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 29

ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA
Ishwarchand – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manish, Gajala Srivastava, Durga Charan Singh Yadav, Manish Kumar Pandey, Manoj Kumar Yadav.

JUDGMENT :

Anjani Kumar Mishra, J.

1. Impleadment applications have been filed in Writ Petition Nos. 35 of 2019 and 41 of 2019 in Court today. The same are taken on record.

2. Office is directed to allot a regular number to these applications.

3. Upon hearing counsel for the parties, the impleadment applications are allowed.

4. Let the same be incorporated today itself.

5. Heard Shri S.K. Purwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.R. Mishra, Senior Advocate for the respondents in these petitions.

6. This bunch of writ petitions arise out of two sets of suits under Section 229-B of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.

7. Six suits were filed by the petitioner claiming on the basis of adverse possession. These suits were decreed by the trial Court and the judgments affirmed by the first appellate Court.

8. However, at the second appellate stage, the judgments of the two Courts below have been reversed and the suits seeking a declaration of having perfected rights by adverse possession have been dismissed.

9. It appears that another set of 6 suits were filed by the defendants in the suits filed by the petitioner claiming that the entry under class 9 in favour of the petitio



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top