SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
SATENDRA @ BANTU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, J.
1. This Jail Appeal under Section 410 read with Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.) has been filed by accused-appellant Satendra @ Bantu through Jail Superintendent Firozabad against the judgment and order dated 23.05.2015 passed by Sri. R.P. Singh, Additional Sessions Judge (Court No. 5), Firozabad. By the impugned judgment, the accused-appellant Satendra @ Bantu has been convicted and sentenced under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'I.P.C.') to rigorous imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In case of default in payment of fine, the accused-appellant has to undergo six months additional imprisonment. He has further been convicted under Section 25 Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. In the event of default, he has to further undergo one month additional imprisonment. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Prosecution case as emerging from First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as 'F.I.R.) and the evidence available on record is that on information given by one Thakur
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Bodh Raj @ Bodha and Ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
C. Chenga Reddy and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ganesh K. Gulve Etc Vs. State Of Maharashtra
Hanumant Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Hukam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivu and Anr. Vs. Registrar General High Court of Karnataka and Anr.
State of U.P. Vs. Akhlaq and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.