SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 116

VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Qamar Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nisar Uddin, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIRENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment and order dated 3.9.2003, passed by Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar in Session Trial No. 100 of 2003 (State of U.P. Vs. Qamar Alam), under Section 4/5 Explosive Substances Act, arising out of Case Crime No. 89 of 2000, P.S.- Chamanganj, Distt.- Kanpur Nagar whereby the accused appellant- Qamar Alam (hereinafter referred as appellant) has been convicted under Section 5 of Explosive Substances Act and has been sentenced for rigorous punishment of two years and fine of Rs. 1000/- and in case of default in payment of fine with an additional period of simple imprisonment of two months.

2. The brief facts relevant for disposal of this appeal are that on 23.8.2000 S.O. of P.S.- Chamanganj, S.I. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari (P.W.-2) with S.I.-Anil Kumar (P.W.-1), Const.- Virendra Singh, Const.- Ravindra Kumar Tiwari, Const.-Chhote Singh Yadav was on patrolling duty to maintain law and order and in the search of wanted criminals. When they reached Mohalla-Humayun Bagh in the area of Dalelpurawa, S.I.-K.N. Tripathi and Const. Jawahar Singh, who were also on patrolling duty,





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top