SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 147

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Arvindar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhishek Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

1. Nobody is present to press the present application even in the revised reading of the cause list. Learned Additional Government Advocate is present for the State.

2. I have perused the records.

3. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the proceedings of Case No. 4615 of 2006, State vs. Raghunath and Others under Section 33(c) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Shahjahanpur.

4. From the perusal of the records it appears that opposite party no. 2 lodged a first information report against the applicants under Section 33(c) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 in police station-Sadar, Shahjahanpur (Kotwali) on 03.05.2004, which states as under:-

^^jsat dsl la[;k 4@04&05@'kkgtgkaiqj jsat Jh equh'k dqekj pkS/kjh ouokjh }kjk fnukad 3-5-2004 dks tkjh fd;k x;kA bldh tkap esjs }kjk dh x;h tkap ds nkSjku ik;k fd Jh fot; dqekj iqjk lkmFk flVh tykykckn flVh dkiksZjsV vkfQl LVsfM;e jksM cjsyh] ,Œ j?kqukFk ÁcU/k ,YkkVk tykykckn ekxZ ds 1 fdŒehŒ 469 ls 470 ds























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top