SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 152

SUDHIR AGARWAL, RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
Ram Shankar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Suman Kumar Yadav.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Krishna Gautam, J.

1. This Jail Appeal under Section 383 Cr.P.C. has been filed through Senior Superintendent, Central Jail, Fatehgarh, by convict appellant Ram Shanker Pandey, against judgment of conviction and sentence therein, dated 31.3.2012, passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Kanpur Nagar, in S.T. No. 1868 of 2008, State vs. Ram Shanker Pandey, arising out of Case Crime No. 134 of 2008, u/s 376 I.P.C. and 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, P.S. Sisamau, District Kanpur Nagar, whereby convict appellant Ram Shanker Pandey has been sentenced for life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 20,000/- and in default one year's additional imprisonment for offence u/s 376 I.P.C. read with section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. Heard Mr. Avinash Jaiswal, learned Amicus Curiae, for appellant and Sri Rishi Chaddha, learned AGA for State.

3. Learned Amicus Curiae for appellant argued that Trial Court failed to appreciate facts and law placed before it. Convict appellant was innocent but has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. There were material contradictions in testimonies of prosecution witnesses, which were placed before lea






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top