AJAY BHANOT
VISHWESH RAJRATNAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Ajay Bhanot, J.
The matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of respondent no. 4 and respondent no. 5. In view of the service report dated 09.07.2014 the services on respondent no. 5 is complete.
2. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
3. By the order dated 21.02.2014 and the consequential orders dated 01.03.2014 and 05.03.2014, the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Lecturer in Civics in the respondent Institution has been invalidated.
4. Thus aggrieved the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 21.02.2014 passed by the Joint Director of Education, Allahabad Region, Allahabad, the order dated 01.03.2014 passed by the Regional Level Committee, Allahabad Region, Allahabad and the consequential order dated 05.03.2014 passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Allahabad in the instant writ petition.
5. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Jitendra Singh is that the petitioner was the senior most teacher who was eligible for being promoted as Lecturer at the relevant point in time. The claim of the petitioner was rejected solely on the groun
Andhra Kesari Educational Society Vs. Director of School Education, reported at
Commissioner., Karnataka Housing Board Vs. C. Muddaiah, reported at
Comptroller and Auditor General of India Vs. K.S. Jagannathan, reported at
Dr. Muktakar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others, reported at
Major General H.M. Singh, VSM Vs. Union of India and another, reported at
State of Maharashtra Vs. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale, reported at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.