SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 194

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
RAVINDRA NATH BHARGAV - Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF U P - Respondent
Application U/S 482 No. 33332 of 2017
Decided on : 09-01-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Harsh Vardhan Gupta, Adv., Alok Ranjan Mishra, Adv., Vikas Mathur, Adv.

The central legal point established is that while the Passport Act allows refusal of passport renewal during a pending criminal case, the court has the discretion to grant no objection based on the circumstances of the case and the applicant's undertaking.

Headnote:

Passport Renewal - Criminal Case - Sections 323, 354B, 504, 506 I.P.C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: Passport Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(f), Article 21 of the Constitution of India - The court discussed the provisions of the Passport Act, 1967, particularly Section 6(2)(f), and the constitutional right to travel abroad under Article 21. It emphasized the discretion of the court in granting no objection for passport renewal during the pendency of a criminal case and highlighted the legislative background and notifications exempting citizens from the operation of certain provisions of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant sought to quash the order rejecting his application for passport renewal due to a pending criminal case against him. He argued that the criminal case was petty in nature and emphasized his fundamental right to renew his passport.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicant had made out a case for allowing the application, considering the nature of the offence against him and his undertaking not to leave India without prior permission.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should grant permission for passport renewal during the pendency of a criminal case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the Passport Act allows refusal of passport renewal during a pending criminal case, there is no statutory bar for the court to grant no objection. It emphasized the discretion of the court and the need to consider all aspects and surrounding circumstances of the case.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order rejecting the applicant's application for passport renewal and provided directions for the applicant to submit an undertaking before the trial court and reapply for passport renewal.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Kumar Singh, J.

Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Alok Ranjan Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Basic Facts

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the order dated 22.07.2017, passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 31879 of 2016 (State vs. Ravindra Bhargav), under Sections 323, 354B, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Pheelkhana, District Kanpur Nagar, whereby learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar has rejected the application dated 03.07.2017 of the applicant for obtaining no objection certificate/permission regarding issuance of passport to the applicant on the ground that in a criminal case pending against the applicant charge has not yet been framed and during the pendency of criminal case, there is no justification for granting permission to renew the passport of the applicant.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that passport bearing no. G2815097 was issued to the applicant by Regional Passport Office, Lucknow on 07.05.2007. The validity of the said passport was up to 06.05.2017. The applicant online applied for renewal of his aforesaid passport on 17.03.2017 but on account of pendency of criminal case under Sections 323, 354B, 504 and 506 I.P.C. pursuant to F.I.R. dated 14.11.2015 against him, his application for renewal was put on hold at Passport Seva Kendra, Kanpur, as per acknowledgement letter dated 17.03.2017. It is contended that the applicant has again submitted re-issue application bearing no. LK2070837505217 dated 17.03.2017 before Regional Passport Office, Lucknow, Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. On seeking status of the above application dated 17.03.2017 by the applicant, Regional Passport Office, Lucknow by letter dated 03.07.2017 given reply to the applicant observing the following discrepancies :-

“1. As per your submitted passport application from a court case pending against you.

2. Please obtain order/no objection from the concerned court.”

“Further request was made to the applicant “to produce proper certificate/explanation for the same without which the requested service cannot be provided to applicant”.

4. In view of above, the applicant filed an application dated 03.07.2017, in Criminal Case No. 31879 of 2016 before the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar for obtaining no objection regarding renewal/re-issuance of passport. The said application of the applicant has been rejected by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 3, Kanpur Nagar vide order dated 22.07.2017 on the ground that a case under Sections 323, 354B, 504 and 506 I.P.C. has been registered against the applicant, in which charge sheet has been filed against the applicant but charge has not yet been framed against the applicant, therefore, during pendency of a criminal case, there is no justification for granting permission for renewal of the passport to the applicant.

Submissions on behalf of applicant

5. Assailing the impugned order dated 22.07.2017 of the court below, learned counsel for the applicant at very outset has placed reliance on the order dated 02.09.2016, passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in Criminal Revision No. 916 of 1988, which is reproduced herein below :-

“Order on Application No. 223300 of 2016

Heard Shri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Samit Gopal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Shri P.K. Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State.

This application has been filed by the applicant-revisionist with the prayer to permit the applicant to travel to U.S.A. from 15.3.2017 to 30.9.2017 and then again from 1.5.2018 to 31.12.2018 and further give suitable directions for the renewal /re-issue of the passport No.-L 9152792 issued on 2.6.2014 from Ghaziabad.

Learned counse

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top