SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petition hers, Sri Ravi Shankar Somvanshi and Sri Akhilesh Pandey who appears for the opposite party nos. 4 to 9 and Sri Sampurnanand Shukla who appears for the Nagar Palika Parishad is not present.

2. The matter was heard on an earlier occasion, but Sri Sampurnanand Shukla failed to assist this Court.

3. The order impugned in this writ petition has been passed on 6.7.2006 by the SDM, Sadar, Pratapgarh under Section 147 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1960 as well as the order dated 2.7.2011 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh in Appeal No. 4135 of 2006 preferred under Section 160 of the Act.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners as respondent nos. 4 to 9 are related to each other. He has referred to paragraph 4 of the writ petition which sketches out the pedigree of Smt. Moona. It is his submission that the house in question was owned by Smt. Moona who had performed two marriages, one with Bhagole and the other with Subrati and is the line of Bhagole, the petitioner and his brother, Abdul Rasheed trace their line to Mattan Miyan son of Bhagole. On the ot