SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 607

ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA
Mohammad Wajid – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sudhanshu Srivastava, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA, J.

1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Gyan Prakash, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for opposite party no.2, Sri Jitendra Kumar Rai, learned A.G.A. assisted by Sri Bhanu Prakash, Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding in Complaint Case No.720 of 2017, Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Mohammad Iqbal and others, under Sections 420, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., and Sections 211, 297, 299, 301, 678, 629-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and Sections 129, 184, 188, 189, 447 and 448 of the Companies Act, 2013, Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow, pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3 and Special Judge, (Companies Act), Dwarka, District Court/Delhi and quashing of the summoning order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the aforesaid court.

3. At the very outset, objection has been raised by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India, Shri Gyan Prakash to the maintainability of this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C before this Court. Ground being that this Court lacks t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top