SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 342

UMESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Ranvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajiv Lochan Shukla, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

UMESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.

1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A (1) of The Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'Act, 1989') has been filed on behalf of the appellants challenging the order dated 21.01.2019 passed by IInd Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act), Etawah, in Complaint Case No. 55 of 2017 (Tarvesh alias Sarvesh v. Ranvir Singh and Another), under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of Act, 1989, Police Station-Basrehar, District-Etawah, whereby appellants have been summoned under the aforesaid sections.

2. Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Ajay Kumar Pathak, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. in opposition and perused the material brought on record.

3. As per prosecution version, complainant/private-respondent Tarvesh alias Sarvesh is a member of the Scheduled Caste. A transformer is installed in his 'khet' (agricultural field). The accused-appellants-Ranvir Singh and Saurabh Yadav used to irrigate their agricultural field by drawing water from the tube well through illegal electric conne


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top