MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.

1. As both the cases have common facts and raises common question of law, they have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. The plaintiff-respondent in both the cases is Smt. Lalmati Devi. Her case is that the suit properties exclusively belonged to her husband Lattu. His name was duly recorded in the revenue records in respect of agricultural lands owned by him. Lattu died issue-less and intestate on 04.01.2013. Consequently, she inherited all the properties left behind by him. According to the plaintiff, about two years before his death, her husband fell seriously ill. Since they were issue-less, therefore, they placed complete faith and reliance upon Devendra, their pattidaar (one of the defendant in both the suits). He taking benefit of the trust reposed in him by the plaintiffs' husband succeeded in procuring a sale deed dated 30.05.2012 in his favour and his brother Pawan as well as a Will dated 02.06.2012. She came to know of the above two documents after the death of her husband when Devendra and his brother Pawan claimed title on basis of these documents in question. The specific case of the plaintiff is that she is