SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 577

GHANDIKOTA SRI DEVI
Kaushal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Avinash Jaiswal, Adv., Gaurav Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ghandikota Sri Devi, J.

The present appeal has been filed by the accused-appellant Kaushal from Jail being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 27.02.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Firozabad whereby the accused-appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 304 I.P.C. and he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and also to pay the fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine, he was further sentenced to simple imprisonment of 3 months, in Sessions Trial No. 167 of 2011 (State Vs. Kaushal) arising out of Case Crime No. 478 of 2010, P.S. Tundla, District Firozabad.

2. The facts in nutshell as emerged from the prosecution case are that the informant Mukesh Rawat, resident of Nai Basti, M.P. Road, Surmewali Gali, Tundla had given a written report at Police Station Tundla inter-alia stating therein that his neighbour and relative Jagdish Prasad, aged about 75 years was residing in his house, he was having 2 sons, namely, Virendra Kumar and Kaushal. However, his both sons were not mentally stable. Kaushal and Jagdish Prasad have kicked out Virendra Kumar from their house and he used to stay in the village










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top