SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 500

IRSHAD ALI
Hafizur Rehman @ Pappu – Appellant
Versus
Kahkashan Begum – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shafiq Mirza, Adv., Humayun Mirza, Adv., Pawan Kumar Mishra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

IRSHAD ALI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Safiq Mirza, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Humayun Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Pawan Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.1.

2. Factual matrix of the case is that Suit No.50 of 2014 was filed by respondent no.1 for injunction. Trial Court granted opportunity to file written statement but the same could not be filed before the trial court. On 16.11.2015, opportunity was granted to file written statement on payment of cost, but written statement was not filed. The petitioner moved an application on 19.4.2016 for grant of permission to file written statement. The application was dismissed vide order dated 6.10.2016. Thereafter, the petitioners moved an application No.C-59 for recall of the order dismissing the application for grant of permission to file written statement. The application was dismissed on 21.2.2017. Thereafter, the petitioner filed written statement on 24.4.2017 and moved an application to accept the written statement before the court below. By means of the impugned order dated 18.9.2017, the application of the petitioner dated 24.4.2017 has been rejected on the ground that the order d




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top