SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 4173

V.K.MATHUR
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Hides International Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Maneesh Mehrotra, Advocate
For the Respondent:A.P. Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

V.K. MATHUR, J. (CHAIRPERSON)

1. This Appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Bank under Section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "SARFAESI Act") against the order dated 16th October, 2014 passed by the learned DRT, Allahabad by which the learned DRT allowed the Securitization Application No. 92 of 2013 filed by the respondents and the entire process as initiated by the Bank on the strength of first demand notice issued under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, dated 9th October, 2012 was quashed. The brief facts of adjudication of the present case are that the respondent company was granted credit facilities by the appellant Bank under various heads for a total sum of Rs. 27.67 crores. The respondent company had mortgaged the immovable property and also plant and machinery for availing the credit facilities. The account of the respondent company became irregular and the appellant Bank classified the account as non-performing asset (NPA) on 26th May, 2012 as per the R.B.I. Guidelines.

2. The appellant-Bank issued a demand notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top