SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 592

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
Sagir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation Distt Sultanpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P. Singh Vatsa, Adv., Ambika Prasad Mishra, Adv., Hari Om Singh, Adv., Rakesh Mishra, Adv., Saghir Hasan Khan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J.

Heard Shri Ambika Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents and Shri Rakesh Mishra, learned counsel representing the private respondents.

2. These proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been instituted challenging the orders passed by the consolidation courts in the proceedings initially drawn under section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act') whereby co-tenancy rights in the land in question have been granted to the respondents along with the petitioners.

3. For the purposes of appreciating the issues and controversies involved in this matter, the following pedigree will be relevant to be mentioned:

 

Okkfgn vyh@okftn 'kkg

 

 

cspbZ 'kkg

 

HkXxw 'kkg

 

 

banjh'k

Qjhn

'kjhQ

 

;quql vyh

gehn

 

'kCchj

Tkfcj

Edlwn

lkfcj

 

 

Ekgewn

ybZd

vyh vgen

oyh eksgEen

rkt eksŒ

eqfLye

[kyhy

 

Ty












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top