DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
Sagir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation Distt Sultanpur – Respondent
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, J.
Heard Shri Ambika Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Upendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents and Shri Rakesh Mishra, learned counsel representing the private respondents.
2. These proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been instituted challenging the orders passed by the consolidation courts in the proceedings initially drawn under section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act') whereby co-tenancy rights in the land in question have been granted to the respondents along with the petitioners.
3. For the purposes of appreciating the issues and controversies involved in this matter, the following pedigree will be relevant to be mentioned:
Okkfgn vyh@okftn 'kkg
cspbZ 'kkg
HkXxw 'kkg
banjh'k
Qjhn
'kjhQ
;quql vyh
gehn
'kCchj
Tkfcj
Edlwn
lkfcj
Ekgewn
ybZd
vyh vgen
oyh eksgEen
rkt eksŒ
eqfLye
[kyhy
Ty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.