SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 434

K.J.THAKER
Hari Babu – Appellant
Versus
Amrit Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ram Singh, Adv., Arun Kumar Shukla, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.

Heard learned counsel holding brief of Sri Ram Singh for the appellant and Sri Arun Kumar Shukla for the respondent - Insurance company. None appears for the owner.

2. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment and award dated 16.7.2004 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Allahabad, (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 829 of 1998 awarding a sum of Rs. 3,77,000/- with interest at the rate of 6 per cent for the injuries suffered by the claimant - appellant, who has amputation on his lower limb.

3. The accident is not in dispute. The issue of negligence is decided in favour of the appellant herein. The Insurance Company has not challenged the liability imposed on them by the Tribunal. The only issue to be decided is the quantum.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the Tribunal has considered Rs.4,000/- per annum which is unjust even in the year of accident. It is submitted that the income of the injured should have been considered to be at least twi
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top