SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Rakesh Deepak Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Revisionist has approached this Court under section 397 Cr.P.C. assailing the order dated 8.1.2013 passed by learned Trial court in the discharge application filed by the revisionist under section 339 Cr.P.C. The revisionist further assailed the order dated 31.1.2013 (amended with permission of this Court vide order dated 16.4.2013) whereby the charges under section 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC have been framed against the Revisionist.
2. This Court has passed the following order on 29.4.2013.
"Counter affidavit filed on behalf of complainant is taken on record.
List on 20.5.2013.
Meanwhile, Rejoinder affidavit may be filed by the revisionist.
State may also file counter affidavit if it so likes by the next date.
Learned counsel for revisionist submitted that in the charge no. 1 framed by the Trial Court, neither the gross sum of amount allegedly misappropriated by the revisionist is disclosed nor the dates on which such misappropriation was made has been mentioned and there has been a total non-compliance of provisions of 212 (2) Cr.P.C.
Till the next date of listing, further proceedings in Crl. Case No. 7646 of 2011, State vs. Rakesh Deepak Shuk
Abdul Sayeed vs. State of M.P. 2010 (10) SCC 259
Darbar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Gurpreet Singh vs. State of Punjab
Ramji Singh vs. State of Bihar
Rafiq Ahmed @ Rafi vs. State of U.P. AIR 2011 SC 3114
Rattiram and Others vs. State of M.P. through Inspector of Police
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Thakkidiram Reddy and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.