PANKAJ KUMAR JAISWAL, YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Sri Hari Keshav, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. By means of the present petition, a direction is sought commanding the respondents to pay additional compensation @ 64.70% and to allot 5% developed land to the petitioners in terms of the judgment of Full Bench in Gajraj Singh and others Vs. State of U.P. And others, 2011 (11) ADJ 1.
3. The petitioners claim to be owners of certain land parcels situate in Village Baraula, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar which were subject matter of acquisition proceedings in terms of notification dated 30.6.1999 issued under Section 4 (1)/17(4), and the notification dated 21.6.2000 issued under Section 6/17 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. The petitioners admit to having received compensation under "The Determination of Compensation and Declaration of Award Rules, 1997" (the Agreement Rules of 1997) made under Section 55 of the Act, 1894.
4. It is an admitted position that the petitioners did not challenge the land acquisition proceed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.