PANKAJ BHATIA, J.

1. Heard Sri Aniruddha Pandey, holding brief of Sri Pramod Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 31.12.2016 and the order dated 28.9.2016 both passed by Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) Mathura, (respondent no. 3) whereby the Additional District Magistrate has directed the taking of the possession of the property situate at Plot No. 45, Jagannathpuri, Ward/Taluk Janambhumi, Tehsil and District Mathura and measuring 232.24 square meters, which is in the name of the petitioner, Smt. Kumkum Tentiwal. The other order dated 28.9.2016 pertains the directions issued for taking the possession of industrial property situate at Khasra No. 387, Khata No. 61, Kota Tehsil, District Mathura.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has stated at the bar that he is not pressing his challenge order dated 28.9.2016 inasmuch as the possession directed in the said order dated 28.9.2016, has already been taken over, he limits the challenge in the present petition to the order dated 31.12.2016. The bri