SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 724

DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA, NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Pandit Amar Nath Misra – Appellant
Versus
U. O. I. Thru. Secy. Home – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Smt. Nalini Prakash Jain

Judgement :

1. A fortnight earlier, a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 2012.2019 has dismissed a writ petition wherein a Mandamus was sought against the Government of India and the State Government to permit the Muslims to offer ‘Namaz’ at the disputed land known as Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid as the Hindus were permitted to perform religious activities in the area. Now the instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner mainly with the prayer that respondents to the writ petition be commanded to permit the petitioner and other members of the Brahmin Sansad to carry out religious activity in nine old/ancient temples housing the idols of various Gods and Goddesses situated on the undisputed acquired land adjacent to the Ram Janam Bhoomi Complex.

2. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is a social activist and is a Chairman of Brahmin Sansad, an Apex body created by a Trust Deed for espousing the cause of the Brahmins. Later on, the Organization started striving for construction of Lord Ram Temple by initiating the process of reconciliation between the parties and with the objective in sight, the petitioner had organized P






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top