SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2598

VIKRAM NATH, A.K.YOG
Subodh Kumar Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

A.K. YOG, VIKRAM NATH, JJ.

1. Sri Subodh Kumar Bhatt, District and Sessions Judge Bagpat, has filed this application under Chapter XXII, Rule 1, Rules of Court read with Article 226, Constitution of India for expunging adverse remarks passed against him in the judgment and order dated 5.11.2004 passed by learned single Judge while finally allowing Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 7218 of 2004.

2. The facts giving rise to the afore-mentioned application are that the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur passed an order dated 5.4.2004 in Case Crime No. 103 of 2004, under Sections 323/506, I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali, District Ghazipur, taking cognizance upon the police report. Accordingly the Chief Judicial Magistrate directed for registration of the case and for issuing summons requiring the accused persons to appear on 21.5.2004 in Court. On 21.5.2004 the accused were not present. The Chief Judicial Magistrate again directed for issuing summons to the accused fixing 21.6.2004. Again on 21.06.2004, the accused were not present and the Chief Judicial Magistrate directed for issuing summons to the accused fixing 31.7.2004. On 31.7.2004 again accused were not present and the Chief Judicial M


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top