ANJANI KUMAR
Karnal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Narayan Singh – Respondent
1. The Petitioners, who were opposite parties, aggrieved by an order passed by the revisional Court approached this Court by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the revisional Court has allowed the revision filed by Respondent.
2. From the narration of fact in the writ petition, it reveals that the Petitioners had filed a suit being Suit No. 836 of 1991, which was decreed vide order dated 11th November, 1992. Aggrieved thereby, the Respondent filed an application u/s 151 of the CPC for setting aside the decree passed in the suit, referred to above. The Petitioners filed their objection in the aforesaid application filed on behalf of Respondent. The trial Court rejected the application u/s 151 of the CPC filed by the Respondent vide its order dated 20th November, 1998. Thereafter the Respondent filed revision before the revisional Court. The revisional Court vide its order impugned in the present writ petition while allowing the revision has set aside the order passed by the trial Court and allowed the application filed by the Respondent setting aside the ex-parte decree passed in Suit No. 836 of 1991 in exercise of power u/s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.