SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 597

K.M.DAYAL, K.C.AGARWAL
Balwant – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.N. Agarwal.

JUDGMENT :

K.M. Dayal, J.

The present petition arises out of proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act (Act of 1960). The Petitioner was issued a notice u/s 10(2) of the Act aforesaid and the Prescribed Authority declared 9 bighas 5 biswas and 6 biswansis of land as surplus on 6th January, 1975.

2. The Petitioner and the State Government both filed appeals against the Judgment of the Prescribed Authority. The 3rd Additional District Judge, Muzaffarnagar, by his order dated 20th September, 1975 partly allowed the appeal of the Petitioner and dismissed that of the State Government. The case was sent down to the Prescribed Authority for re-calculating the surplus area in accordance with the orders passed by the appellate court. A writ petition was filed before this Court but the same was dismissed summarily.

3. Subsequently the Prescribed Authority issued another notice to the Petitioner u/s 10(2) of the Act for re-determination of the surplus area. This notice was issued to the Petitioner under the provisions of sub Section (3) of Section 31 of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1976 (U.P. Act No. XX of 1976). Under the new notice the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top