K.M.DAYAL, K.C.AGARWAL
Balwant – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
K.M. Dayal, J.
The present petition arises out of proceedings under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act (Act of 1960). The Petitioner was issued a notice u/s 10(2) of the Act aforesaid and the Prescribed Authority declared 9 bighas 5 biswas and 6 biswansis of land as surplus on 6th January, 1975.
2. The Petitioner and the State Government both filed appeals against the Judgment of the Prescribed Authority. The 3rd Additional District Judge, Muzaffarnagar, by his order dated 20th September, 1975 partly allowed the appeal of the Petitioner and dismissed that of the State Government. The case was sent down to the Prescribed Authority for re-calculating the surplus area in accordance with the orders passed by the appellate court. A writ petition was filed before this Court but the same was dismissed summarily.
3. Subsequently the Prescribed Authority issued another notice to the Petitioner u/s 10(2) of the Act for re-determination of the surplus area. This notice was issued to the Petitioner under the provisions of sub Section (3) of Section 31 of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings (Amendment) Act, 1976 (U.P. Act No. XX of 1976). Under the new notice the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.