SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 572

C.S.P.SINGH
Mangru – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lakhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.R. Misra
For the Respondent: V.N. Khare

JUDGMENT :

C.S.P. SINGH, J.

1. This is a revision by the Defendant. The suit had been filed for declaration that the Plaintiff had not adopted the Defendant, and he was not his adopted son. The suit was valued at Rs. 500/-. Its valuation was based on the valuation of a house in which the Plaintiff alleged to have half share. The Defendant objected to the valuation of the house disclosed in the plaint and alleged inter alia that its valuation was not less than Rs. 4,000/-. and apart from that the Plaintiff has another house in village Bokta, It was contended on behalf of the Defendant that the trial court had no jurisdiction to try the suit, as the valuation of the property involved in the suit exceeded the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court.

2. The trial court directed the Court Amin o value the house at Bokta alleged by the Defendant to belong to the Plaintiff. The Amin valued it at Rs. 10,947. 25 P. The Munsif decided the issue of jurisdiction in favour of the Plaintiff, on the view that the property owned by the Plaintiff is only the house disclosed in the plaint, and that the report of the Amin was beyond jurisdiction. Valuation of a suit for purposes of determining as to whether










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top