SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 832

MARKANDEY KATJU
Tek Chand Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Chandra Prakash

JUDGMENT :

M. Katju, J.

By means of this writ petition the Petitioner prays for regularisation as Assistant Engineer in the U.P. Public Works Department in accordance with the U.P Regularisation of ad hoc promotions Rules, 1988 (Annexure 7 to the writ petition). The Petitioner had obtained a Diploma in Civil Engineering and he joined the Public Works Department, U.P. on 20-6-1956 as a trainee Overseer. On successful completion of his training he was appointed as ad hoc Overseer on 23-10-1956 and as officiating Overseer on 20-6-1957 The Petitioner's appointment as an Overseer was approved by the U.P. Public Service Commission in 1959 and he was placed in the list of Overseers prepared by the Commission; The nomenclature of the post of Overseer was changed to Junior Engineer in 1959 and the Petitioner was confirmed in the said post. The Petitioner has been promoted as Assistant Engineer in 1981 and be has been working as Assistant Engineer in ad hoc capacity since then. Now by this writ petition the Petitioner prays that he should be considered for regularisation first before promoting other Junior Engineers who are not working as Assistant Engineers.

2. A counter affidavit has been fil














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top