SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 875

MARKANDEY KATJU
Kumari Kusum Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Birendra Kumar Srivastava.
For the Respondent: L.P. Naithani.

JUDGMENT :

M. Katju, J.

In this case on 1-5-1992 Hon'ble M.P. Singh, J. granted the Respondents eight weeks time to file counter affidavit, and directed the petition to be listed for admission on 10-7-1992.

2. Subsequently on 9-6-1992 an application was filed before me praying that an interim direction be issued to the Respondent for continuing the Petitioner as Lecturer in Zoology in H. N.B. Garhwal University, Garhwal. In para 8 of the affidavit in support of the application it has been alleged that when the case was taken up on 1-5-1992 by Hon'ble M.P. Singh, J. the counsel for the Petitioner could not appear and press the prayer for interim relief It has been alleged in para 5 of the affidavit that in a large number of similar petitions (referred to in paragraphs 13 to 15 of the writ petition) interim orders have been passed. In paragraphs 9 and 10 of the affidavit it is alleged that the Petitioner has come to know that the Commission is going to finalize regular selection by the end of June, 1992 and some other person will be selected in place of the Petitioner, and hence the urgency in the matter.

3. On 9-6-92 I directed this application to be put up on 11-6-92 and further direct











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top