S.R. SINGH, J.

1. The two petitions in hand are directed against two sets of identical notices-one issued u/s 198(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (In short the Act) and the other issued under Rule 115-P of Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules (In short the Rules) and a common order dated 18.2.1993 passed by the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Allahabad whereby the Board of Revenue rejected as not maintainable the two connected revisions arising out of the notices aforesaid. The notices issued to the Petitioners in original filed by Smt. Bhoodevi and others were phrased in the following words.

Adhivakta Prartli Ko Suna Gaya Tatha Tahsildar Ki Janch Akhya Ka Avlokan Kiya. Report Tahsildar Se Vidit Hota Ki Pratham Drasti Me s Karyawahi Apekshit He. Atah Notice Dhara 198 (4) Uttar Pradesh Ja. Vi. Evem Bhu. Bya, Adhiniyam Jarl Hokar Dinank 16.11.89 Ko Pesh Ho.

Similarly, the notices issued u/s 198(4) of the UPZA and LR Act to the Petitioners in both the petitions are couched in the following words.

Adhivakta Prarthi Ko Suna Gaya Tatha Tahsildar Ki Janch Akhya Ka Avlokan Kiya, Report Tahsildar Se Vidit Hota He Ki Pratham