SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 973

V.N.KHARE, J.S.SIDHU
Jugal Kishore – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Raj Singh and L.P. Naithani.

JUDGMENT :

V.N. Khare, J.

When these petitions were filed, this Court directed the learned Standing Counsel to file counter affidavit on behalf of the Respondents. In pursuance of those orders Respondents have filed a counter affidavit in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 30122 of 1994. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that since the stand taken by the Respondents is identical in all the writ petitions the counter affidavit filed in Writ Petition No. 30122 of 1994 may be read in all the petitions In which counter affidavits had been called for. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner does not propose to file any rejoinder affidavit. Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that these petitions may be disposed of at the admission, stage. Accordingly, we propose to decide all these petitions finally.

2. These petitions can be split into three sets of writ petitions. The first set consists of writ petitions No. 30109 of 1994, 30122 of 1994, 30135 of 1994, 30149 of 1994, 30151 of 1994, 30317 of 1994, 30670 of 1994, 31034 of 1994, 31131 of 1994, 31123 of 1994, 31024 of 1994, 31125 of 1994, and 31129, of 1994 and 30933 of 1994 the second set of writ petitions are 30111 of 1994, 31318 of 1994 and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top